Proximal tibia triplane fracture with apophyseal avulsion
- Benjamin Lin ,
- Haider Twaij ,
- Mohammed Monem and
- Khaled M Sarraf
- Trauma & Orthopaedics, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Correspondence to Benjamin Lin; benjaminlin25@gmail.com
Abstract
Tibial tuberosity fractures occur in fewer than 1% of all paediatric fractures. We present this unusual case of an early adolescent football player who presented to the emergency department after sustaining an injury during a tackle. CT confirmed a tibial apophyseal fracture concurrent with a proximal tibial triplane fracture. The fracture was subsequently reduced operatively with cancellous cannulated screws. There are only 11 cases published in the literature of triplane fractures of the proximal tibia. Both other cases that involve a concurrent tibial tuberosity fracture with a triplane extension were sustained following a footballing injury. We therefore propose that forced knee flexion alongside a rotational component, common to football, may promote this rare fracture pattern. It is hoped that this case can be used to shed light on a possible mechanism and to guide future management.
Background
Tibial tuberosity fractures occur in fewer than 1% of all paediatric fractures, typically occurring in boys of adolescent age and are typically caused during athletic activities.1 Although relatively rare, they are well documented. Common sports include basketball, football and athletics.2 3 The mechanism of injury is through either concentric contraction of the quadriceps during jumping, or with an eccentric contraction while the knee is in forced flexion.4 These forces result in a pull of the patella tendon from its insertion at the tibial tuberosity.
In the proximal tibia, there are two ossification centres. The first is in the proximal tibia physeal plate itself, whereas the second is in the apophysis. During the early adolescent years, the physeal plate closes postero-anteriorly and proximo-distally with the second ossification centre closing later than the first.3
In the 1950s, Reginald Watson-Jones classified tibial tuberosity fractures into types I, II and III, respectively, representing avulsion of the tibial tubercle alone, extension across the physis without entering the knee joint and finally proximal extension into the knee.5 This classification was subsequently modified by Ogden et al to more accurately define specific fracture patterns and to guide treatment for different fracture types by considering displacement and comminution.6
We discuss an alternative presentation of a paediatric avulsion fracture, where the tibial tuberosity fracture extends into a triplanar fracture of the proximal tibia without intra-articular involvement.
Triplane fractures of the distal tibia have been well researched and considered in paediatric injuries over the last 50 years having been first described by Lynn et al.7 As the name suggests, triplane fractures occur in three planes (transverse, sagittal and coronal) and involve the metaphysis, physis and epiphysis of the bone. The distinctive fracture configuration is typically influenced by both the deforming forces applied during injury, but also as a result of the pattern of growth plate closure seen in the adolescent population. This has been described as beginning with central physeal closure followed by anteromedial, then posteromedial and finally lateral closure of the growth plate.8
Although triplane fractures of other joints have been reported in the literature,9 10 they are infrequent and rare. Physeal fractures of the proximal tibia in particular account for just 1%–3% of all physeal injuries.6 11 12
We present this unusual case of a tibial apophyseal fracture concurrent with a proximal triplane fracture following a secondary injury due to lack of appropriate management and compliance. This might be an underreported variant of the proximal tibial injuries in the adolescent sportive population that will shed light to future possible mechanism and guide management.
Case presentation
A healthy, fit and well, early adolescent football player presented to his local emergency department after hearing a click in his left knee while kicking the ball with his right foot. This was immediately followed by pain and inability to fully weight bear on the left leg. Plain radiographs showed an abnormal elevation of the tibial tubercle suggestive of a mildly displaced avulsion fracture (figure 1). He was treated conservatively in the first instance and advised to rest the leg for 2 weeks.
Lateral view from initial plain radiograph showing tibial tuberosity avulsion.
The patient re-presented to the emergency department 2 weeks later. Due to an improvement of symptoms, the patient had restarted football prematurely and sustained a tackle where again he noted a loud click, followed by a sharp pain in his left knee. This time, the injury was associated with immediate swelling over the knee and complete inability to weight bear. Subsequent plain radiographs showed further widening of the anterior growth plate of the upper tibial apophysis, consistent with a worsening avulsion growth plate injury (figure 2).
Lateral view from plain radiograph following second presentation with worsening tibial tuberosity physeal widening.
Investigations
A limited CT scan was performed confirming the widening of the apophyseal growth plate as well as a Salter-Harris type IV fracture of the posterior aspect of the tibia (figure 3A,B).
CT showing complex Salter-Harris IV triplane fracture. (A) Coronal plane showing lateral epiphysial Salter-Harris III fracture. (B) Sagittal plane showing Salter-Harris II.
The patient’s management was subsequently escalated to our institution, a tertiary orthopaedic centre with a paediatric unit. Following multi-disciplinary team (MDT) discussion, an MRI of the knee was requested to assess any concurrent soft tissue injury given the history and mechanism of injury. It would also help to identify any early soft callus, visualise any periosteal interposition within the fracture site preventing reduction, as well as identifying associated intra-articular lesions, including cruciate ligamentous injury. Indeed, the MRI demonstrated periosteal entrapment at the tibial tuberosity alongside grade 1 sprains of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), superficial medial collateral ligament (MCL) and the myotendinous junction of popliteus.
Treatment
Initially, closed reduction with manipulation under anaesthesia was attempted without success. Therefore, a conversion to open reduction and internal fixation of the fracture was performed. A longitudinal incision was made over the tibial tuberosity with careful dissection down to the fracture site. A large periosteal sleeve was identified caught within the fracture site (figure 4), as demonstrated on the MRI. This was removed and any torn parts excised. The fracture was subsequently reduced and, with the knee in hyperextension and the reduction held by hand, fixed with two, 4 mm partially threaded, cancellous cannulated screws with washers.
Intraoperative findings: removal of periosteum (arrow) within fracture site.
Outcome and follow-up
Postoperatively, the patient was placed in an above leg cast with 15° of flexion, non-weight bearing (NWB), with gradual extension of a hinged knee brace on to 45° and 90° over the course of 6 weeks (figure 5A,B). At 6-week follow-up, scars were completely healed and the patient had an intact straight leg raise, but with minor lag due to pain along the patellar tendon. Weight bearing was commenced at this point. By 3 months, the patient had no leg length discrepancy or angular deformity seen and he returned to sport, participating in full sport by 4 months. Despite the concerns for growth plate deformity and potential for recurvatum, no obvious growth deformity was noted.
Two-week follow-up plain radiographs. (A) Lateral view. (B) Anteroposterior view.
Discussion
Within the available literature, triplane fractures of the proximal tibia have only been reported in 11 cases and documented in 10 articles (table 1).
Proximal tibial triplane fractures documented in the literature
References | Age | Activity and mechanism of injury | Management |
Aymen et al 18 | 12 | Fall from own height | Steinmann pins Cast immobilisation for 6 weeks |
Lehreitani et al 19 |
16 | Cycling Fall with blunt trauma |
Cannulated screws Immediate passive flexion/rehab |
Strelzow et al 13 | 13 | Skiing Hit tree Direct blow with twisting injury |
Cannulated screws Long last cast NWB 4 weeks |
Sinigaglia et al 20 |
15 | Road traffic accident | Percutaneous fixation |
Neilly et al 15 | 14 | Football Extension of the knee joint against resistance, combined with a rotational component as the player fell and his opponent landed on top of the injured limb |
Concurrent tibial tuberosity fracture Cannulated screws Increasing hinge brace 6 weeks |
Nowicki et al 17 | 11 | Sledding Direct trauma with guardrail |
Trapped periosteum Steinmann pins+cannulated screws Hinge brace in extension 2 weeks PWB at 5 weeks, NWB at 10 weeks |
Kanellopoulos et al 21 |
15 | Motorcycle Fall onto outstretched leg |
Cannulated screws Plaster case in extension NWB 3 weeks PWB over next 6 week with RoM exercises |
Hermus et al 16 | 17 | Football distortion injury | Concurrent tibial tuberosity fracture Arthroscopic stapling 6-week cast immobilisation |
Piétu et al 22 | Unable to find article | ||
Conroy et al 14 | 11 | Kneeling Brother fell on patient |
Cannulated screw |
-
NWB, non-weight bearing; PWB, partial weight bearing; RoM, Range of Motion.
The age of the patients discussed range from 11 to 17 years with mechanisms of injury including a fall from height, accidents during cycling, skiing and sledding; a road traffic accident; and a case of a brother landing on the patient while kneeling. Interestingly, multiple cases reported injury following a tackle when playing football. Two of the ten cases also report a concomitant apophyseal fracture of the tibial tuberosity. Generally, these triplane fractures were managed with pins and cannulated screws to reduce the fracture followed by a variable period of NWB. All cases report good to excellent outcomes in function and expected growth.
Triplane fractures of the proximal tibia are rare. A possible explanation for this rarity is that the proximal tibia has a more symmetrical closure pattern compared with the distal tibia, although there is significantly less literature available to confirm this.13 Another contributor may be the insertion of the collateral knee ligaments into the tibial metaphysis, resulting in stresses bypassing the epiphysis unlike at the ankle.14
Our case is not the first to discuss a tibial apophyseal avulsion injury as the main presenting imaging finding.15 16 A sudden contraction of the quadriceps or passive flexion of the knee with contracted quadriceps is likely to be the primary mechanism for this type of injury, whereby the patella tendon pull exceeds the strength of the physis and periosteum causing avulsion at the insert.15
Interestingly, both cases in the literature that involve a concurrent tibial tuberosity fracture with a triplane extension were sustained following a footballing injury. We therefore propose that forced knee flexion alongside a rotational component, common to football, may promote a mechanical reason for this specific fracture pattern.
In our case, we report an interesting mechanism of injury, which is likely to be a two-part process. The initial non-contact mechanism while kicking the ball is likely to have caused the initial avulsion injury of the tibial tuberosity. It is therefore possible that this has predisposed the bone to a completion of the triplane fracture 2 weeks later whereby a rotational deforming force to the proximal tibia is likely to have been generated following a tackle. This is a similar mechanism to that proposed by Neilly et al.15 This is likely contrary to ACL injuries where the main force is forced flexion followed by rotation rather than primarily rotation.
The fracture pattern for our case does not fit into a particular classification. Initially, the tibial tuberosity fracture appears to have been a 2A fracture configuration according to the modified Ogden Classification. After the second injury, this has worsened; however, the configuration appears to be a mix between a type IVB with the metaphyseal fracture component alongside physeal fracture and the IIA/IIIA tibial tuberosity fracture, which together completes the triplane configuration. Our case had the benefit of multiple modalities of three-dimensional (3D) imaging, which has picked this configuration up, whereas a tibial tuberosity fracture may not routinely have further imaging past a plain radiograph. Therefore, does this suggest that this fracture configuration may have a higher incidence than the literature would suggest? We propose that with further cases, there is an argument to broaden the Ogden Classification to include this fracture configuration.
The definitive operative management for this patient was ultimately unchanged from an isolated tibial tuberosity fracture, treated with cannulated screws for reduction. There is perhaps an argument that with X-rays showing a clear and obvious deformity, this may have been enough to proceed with appropriate operative management, mitigating the requirement for 3D imaging which both increase radiation risk and delays the time to operation.
A CT scan, however, does allow for precise visualisation of fracture configuration and increases confidence in surgical planning. Classification of the fracture is more accurate and in particular, any involvement of the intra-articular surface can be identified. With relation to the likely high impact and rotational forces involved, an MRI scan is useful in identifying concurrent soft tissue injury of the knee joint, such as associated intra-articular injury to the ACL, assessment of the physeal plate, as well as to identify any soft tissue trapping within the fracture site preventing adequate reduction. In our case and as documented by Nowicki et al,17 periosteal trapping is not uncommon. As such, we recommend MRI scans for all suspected triplane injuries of the proximal tibia with a low threshold for open reduction and internal fixation, to clear the likely presence of a periosteal sleeve caught within the fracture fragment.
Learning points
-
Proximal tibial tuberosity triplane fractures are uncommon but carry with them the need for high clinical vigilance.
-
Good anatomical reduction and stabilisation is required to prevent future arthritis, pain and deformity.
-
Triplane extension of tibial tuberosity fractures should be considered where there is likely to have been a rotational component to the mechanism of injury.
-
Both CT and MRI should be considered to assess for fracture configuration as well as soft tissue involvement.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Footnotes
-
Contributors The following authors were responsible for drafting of the text, sourcing and editing of clinical images, investigation results, drawing original diagrams and algorithms, and critical revision for important intellectual content: BL, HT, MM and KMS. Supervised by KMS. Patient under the care of KMS and clinical care provided by all authors BL, HT, MM and KMS. Article written by BL. Drafts checked and amended by HT, MM and KMS. The following authors gave final approval of the manuscript: BL, HT, MM and KMS.
-
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
References
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer